Helper for Text 34.1.6: the effective domain of a globally concave EReal slice is
convex.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: the first effective domain is the intersection of the concave slice
domains dom (u ↦ K u v).
Helper for Text 34.1.6: the second effective domain is the intersection of the convex slice
domains dom (v ↦ K u v).
Helper for Text 34.1.6: fixing the second variable yields a convex first-variable slice domain.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: fixing the first variable yields a convex second-variable slice domain.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: every point of dom₁ K × dom₂ K is a finite-valued point of K.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: membership in the saddle effective domain is exactly coordinatewise membership in the two effective domains.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: every point of dom K lies in the finiteness domain of K.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: the saddle effective domain is convex once the two coordinate effective domains are convex.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: the concavity side of a saddle-function gives Jensen's inequality on each fixed-second-variable slice.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: the convexity side of a saddle-function gives Jensen's inequality on each fixed-first-variable slice.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: convex combinations of points in dom₁ K stay in dom₁ K.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: convex combinations of points in dom₂ K stay in dom₂ K.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: convex combinations of points in dom K stay in dom K.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: the first effective domain is convex for a concave-convex saddle function.
Helper for Text 34.1.6: the second effective domain is convex for a concave-convex saddle function.
Text 34.1.6: if K is concave-convex on ℝ^m × ℝ^n, then dom₁ K is convex in ℝ^m
and dom₂ K is convex in ℝ^n; consequently dom K is convex in ℝ^m × ℝ^n, and K is
finite at every point of dom K.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the v-section of the open-unit-square power upper simple
extension at u = 1 / 2 fails concavity on all of ℝ, because two off-domain points have an
in-domain midpoint.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the open-unit-square power upper simple extension is not
convex-concave on all of ℝ × ℝ.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the open-unit-square power upper simple extension is not a global saddle-function, so it cannot satisfy the theorem's upper-extension conclusion.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: on the open unit square, the real power kernel carries the concave-convex saddle orientation used by the textbook example.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the upper simple extension of the open-unit-square power kernel is
definitionally the openUnitSquarePowerSaddle counterexample.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the exact universal theorem claim, isolated as a single proposition so the open-unit-square counterexample can specialize it.
Equations
Instances For
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the open-unit-square power example satisfies every hypothesis in the isolated theorem claim.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the specialized upper simple extension for the open-unit-square power kernel is already not a global saddle-function.
Helper for Text 34.1.7: the full specialized conclusion is false, because its upper simple extension branch is the already refuted open-unit-square counterexample.