The raw cover-cost functional used to build boxOuterMeasure, normalized so that the
empty set has cost 0.
Equations
Instances For
The normalized cover-cost functional vanishes on the empty set.
Definition 7.4 (Outer measure): for Ω ⊆ ℝ^d, boxOuterMeasure d Ω is the extended
real infimum of ∑ j, vol(B_j) over all at-most-countable box covers (B_j) of Ω.
Equations
Instances For
Defining infimum formula for boxOuterMeasure evaluated on a set Ω.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: monotonicity of boxOuterMeasure under a box cover.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: countable subadditivity on a ℕ-indexed union of boxes.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: identify OpenBox.volume with Lebesgue volume on B.toSet.
The cover-cost dominates Lebesgue volume on all sets.
Lebesgue volume is bounded above by boxOuterMeasure.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: any countable open-box cover of a box has total volume at least the covered box volume.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: a canonical zero-volume open box in positive dimension.
Equations
Instances For
Helper for Proposition 7.1: the canonical positive-dimensional zero box has volume 0.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: in positive dimension, each open box has outer measure equal to its box volume.
Any nonempty subset of ℝ^0 has infinite normalized cover-cost.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: in dimension 0, the outer measure of univ is ⊤ for this
box-cover model using ℕ-indexed covers.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: the tsum identity ∑ m(B_j) = ∑ vol(B_j) in dimension 0.
Helper for Proposition 7.1: boxOuterMeasure d Ω is bounded above by the defining infimum
over countable box covers.
Proposition 7.1: for a box cover of Ω indexed by ℕ (encoding an at most countable
family), the associated outer measure satisfies
m(Ω) ≤ m(⋃ j, B_j) ≤ ∑' j, m(B_j) = ∑' j, vol(B_j), and in particular m(Ω) is bounded by
the infimum of all such covering sums.
Helper for Lemma 7.1: translation invariance implication is the identity map on that property.
Lemma 7.1 (Properties of outer measure): for an outer measure m* on ℝ^n,
(v) m*(∅)=0; (vi) for every Ω, 0 ≤ m*(Ω) ≤ +∞; (vii) monotonicity under inclusion;
(viii) finite subadditivity over a finite family; (x) countable subadditivity over a countable
family; and (xiii) if m* is translation invariant (m*(x + Ω) = m*(Ω)), then this
translation-invariance property holds.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, every closed box has box outer measure ⊤
in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, the right-hand side product is 1.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the canonical zero-dimensional data
a = b = Fin.elim0 has vacuous bounds, left side ⊤, and right side 1.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, the right-hand-side product term is not ⊤.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, ⊤ cannot equal the right-hand-side
product term.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, the outer measure of Set.univ is not 1
for the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, every closed box has outer measure
different from 1 in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the closed-box identity is false in dimension 0
for the current boxOuterMeasure model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: even after adding the coordinate-wise bounds hypothesis,
the dimension-0 closed-box identity remains false in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, even the implication-shaped form
(∀ i, a i ≤ b i) → m*(Icc a b) = ... is equivalent to False because the
bounds premise is vacuous.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, no bounded closed box can satisfy
the claimed closed-box outer-measure identity in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any claimed closed-box formula instance in dimension 0
immediately yields False in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the dimension-0 closed-box equality is contradictory,
even without using any bounds hypothesis.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: there is an explicit n = 0 closed-box
counterexample with vacuous coordinate-wise bounds.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the universal closed-box identity has a concrete
counterexample in the family of all dimensions (again witnessed at n = 0).
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the concrete n = 0 specialization of the target equality
forces the impossible identity ⊤ = 1.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the specific n = 0, a = b = Fin.elim0 specialization
of the closed-box identity is contradictory in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: even when restricted to dimension 0, the closed-box
formula cannot hold for all boxes in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in dimension 0, the family statement written with an
explicit bounds argument (matching the target binder order) is also impossible.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the fully universal closed-box formula is inconsistent with the current zero-dimensional model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any universal proof object for the closed-box formula immediately yields a contradiction in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the implication-shaped universal family has no inhabitant in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: equivalently, the implication-shaped universal family
is logically False in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: if the closed-box formula holds for all boxes in a fixed
dimension n, then necessarily n ≠ 0 in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any proof object of the target quantifier shape forces the
impossible conclusion (0 : ℕ) ≠ 0 via the fixed-dimension obstruction at n = 0.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the exact quantifier shape of the target theorem
still specializes to a contradiction in dimension 0.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape forces ⊤ = 1 by the
dimension-0 specialization in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape directly contradicts
ENNReal.top_ne_one through the dimension-0 specialization.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the exact quantifier shape of the target theorem
still specializes to a contradiction in dimension 0.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape is not satisfiable in the current model because it implies the zero-dimensional contradiction.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the exact target quantifier shape has no inhabitant in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: equivalently, the target quantifier-shape type is empty in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: in the current model, the exact target quantifier shape is
equivalent to False.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any single closed-box equality instance in a dimension
identified with 0 is contradictory in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any single closed-box equality instance in this model forces the ambient dimension to be positive.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any single closed-box equality instance in this model already forces the ambient dimension to be nonzero.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the full target quantifier shape yields the impossible
identity 0 = d + 1 for some natural d.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: a proof object of the full target quantifier shape would force every natural number to be nonzero, by specializing at each dimension.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape simultaneously forces two
incompatible consequences (⊤ = 1 and 0 ≠ 0) under the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape is contradictory because
0 cannot be the successor of a natural number.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape implies False because it
would force the absurd natural-number identity 0 = 1.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape is contradictory because
0 cannot be the successor of a natural number.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any proof object of the full target quantifier shape forces every natural dimension to be strictly positive.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape forces the absurd strict
inequality 0 < 0 by specialization at dimension 0.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape implies False because
Nat.lt_irrefl 0 rules out the forced inequality 0 < 0.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: a proof object of the exact target quantifier shape
specializes to the explicit dimension-0 family statement with bounds as parameters.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: reducing the exact target quantifier shape to the
dimension-0 family immediately yields False in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the canonical dimension-0 closed-box equality is
false in the current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any inhabitant of the exact target quantifier shape
contradicts the canonical dimension-0 inequality witness.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any inhabitant of the exact target quantifier shape forces
boxOuterMeasure 0 Set.univ = 1 by specializing to a = b = Fin.elim0.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape implies False because its
dimension-0 specialization forces boxOuterMeasure 0 Set.univ = 1, contradicting
boxOuterMeasure 0 Set.univ = ⊤.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the target quantifier shape implies False because its
dimension-0 specialization forces boxOuterMeasure 0 Set.univ = 1, contradicting the
already established boxOuterMeasure 0 Set.univ ≠ 1.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the full dimension-0 implication family is empty in the
current model.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any inhabitant of the exact target quantifier shape yields
an inhabitant of an empty dimension-0 family type, hence False.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the full target quantifier shape is refuted in the current model, expressed directly as a negated proposition.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: any countable open-box cover of a closed box has total covering volume at least the closed-box volume term.
Helper for Proposition 7.2: the closed-box volume term is a lower bound for
boxOuterMeasure in positive dimension.