The one-sided directional difference quotient of f on E at x₀ in direction v.
Equations
Instances For
Definition 6.9: f is one-sided directionally differentiable at the interior point x₀ in
the direction v if the limit of the difference quotient along t → 0 with t > 0 and
x₀ + t v ∈ E exists.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The one-sided directional derivative Dᵥ f(x₀) as the limit value, assuming the directional
derivative exists in the sense of one-sided directional differentiability.
Equations
- oneSidedDirectionalDerivWithin E f x₀ v h = Classical.choose ⋯
Instances For
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if x₀ is an interior point of E, then t = 0 belongs to the
directional-constraint set {t | x₀ + t • v ∈ E}.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: a nhdsWithin limit at 0 over a set containing 0 fixes the
function value at 0.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: the directional difference quotient in the theorem statement has value
0 at t = 0.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: any limit claim in the theorem's unpunctured nhdsWithin filter forces
the claimed limit value to be 0.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if f' v ≠ 0, then the theorem's unpunctured directional-limit
statement cannot hold.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: the identity map has derivative id within univ at every point.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for nonzero t, the identity-map directional quotient simplifies
to the direction vector v.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: the identity map has the expected punctured directional limit
t → 0, t ≠ 0, namely v.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for nonzero direction v, the theorem's unpunctured directional-limit
conclusion fails for the identity map on ℝⁿ.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for any nonzero direction, the identity map on univ provides
concrete derivative data together with failure of the unpunctured directional-limit conclusion.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: in dimension 1, the standard basis direction e₀ is nonzero.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: there is a concrete dimension-1 counterexample witness to the
unpunctured directional-limit claim (identity map on univ and direction e₀).
Helper for Lemma 6.6: in dimension 1, the identity map at the concrete direction
e₀ has the expected punctured directional limit, while the unpunctured target-limit claim
still fails.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for the identity map on univ, any unpunctured directional limit at
0 forces the direction vector to be 0.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: interior-point differentiability within E upgrades to ambient
Fréchet differentiability at the same base point.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: an ambient Fréchet derivative yields the punctured directional
difference-quotient limit along 𝓝[≠] 0.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: a punctured-neighborhood directional limit remains valid after
restricting the source filter to points with x₀ + t • v ∈ E.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: the punctured directional-quotient formulation is derivable from a within-domain Fréchet derivative at an interior point.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: differentiability at an interior point yields the punctured
directional-difference-quotient limit to f' v, i.e. the mathematically correct directional
limit statement with t ≠ 0 explicitly enforced in the source filter.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: corrected directional-derivative statement using the punctured
source filter (t ≠ 0), matching the mathematically valid formulation.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if the theorem's unpunctured directional-limit claim holds for given
data, then the directional value f' v is forced to be zero.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: at an interior point, any unpunctured directional-limit claim with nonzero directional value is contradictory; this obstruction does not use differentiability.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: at an interior point, the unpunctured directional-constraint set
is obtained by inserting 0 into the punctured constraint set.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if the punctured directional quotient tends to f' v and that value
is 0, then the corresponding unpunctured directional limit follows.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: once the punctured directional quotient converges to f' v,
the unpunctured directional-limit claim is equivalent to the vanishing condition f' v = 0.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: there exists explicit differentiable data (identity map on univ in
dimension 1) for which the theorem's unpunctured directional-limit conclusion fails.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: there is explicit differentiable data (identity map on univ in
dimension 1) where the unpunctured directional-limit conclusion fails and the claimed limit
value f' v is nonzero.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: the unpunctured directional-limit conclusion cannot hold as a
universal theorem; the explicit dimension-1 identity-map data is a counterexample.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: even after restricting to nonzero directional values f' v ≠ 0,
the unpunctured directional-limit conclusion is still not universally valid.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for fixed differentiable data, the theorem's unpunctured
directional-limit claim is equivalent to the directional value f' v being zero.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if the directional value f' v is nonzero, then the theorem's
unpunctured directional-limit claim is impossible for that fixed differentiable data.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for fixed differentiable data at an interior point, failure of the unpunctured directional-limit target is equivalent to the directional value being nonzero.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if the theorem's unpunctured directional-limit conclusion held for every direction (for fixed data at an interior point), then the derivative map would be the zero linear map.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for fixed differentiable data, any proof of the theorem's
unpunctured directional-limit target contradicts a nonzero directional value f' v.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if the theorem's target claim is equivalent to the vanishing
directional value f' v = 0, then any nonzero directional value excludes that target claim.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: if the theorem's target claim is equivalent to f' v = 0, then
under f' v ≠ 0 that target claim is equivalent to False.
Helper for Lemma 6.6: for fixed differentiable data at an interior point, if
f' v ≠ 0, then the theorem's unpunctured target statement is equivalent to False.